Zoning intelligence for feasibility decisions.

A decision-ready feasibility view from zoning and code constraints: credible yield ranges and the drivers behind them.

Built for NYC, where small constraints change the deal early.

Feasibility Check Yield Ranges Air Rights Relevance
Built for first-pass screens
Range + constraint signals (not “max FAR”)
Air rights relevance: when they change the deal
WHY IT MATTERS

Feasibility is a decision, not an answer.

It’s about deciding whether to proceed.

Feasibility judgments happen fast — often through informal checks, partial information, and experience-based assumptions. The outcome isn’t certainty — it’s whether to proceed.

The outcome isn’t certainty — it’s whether to proceed.

Those judgments already exist inside experienced teams. AirFeet makes them explicit, repeatable, and easier to align on — before they disappear into memos, models, and process.

CAPABILITIES

From zoning rules to a feasibility decision

Zoning defines what’s allowed. AirFeet helps frame what’s feasible — early, credibly, and in a way teams can align on.

1

Feasibility Signals

Surface constraints that can break the deal

Identify the code and design constraints most likely to compress yield or prevent a viable scheme.

  • Stair count pressure
  • Mixed-use separation challenges
  • Courtyard likelihood
  • Code-driven design friction

Signals guide judgment — they don’t replace it.

Output: a focused list of constraints worth pressure-testing.

2

Yield Ranges

Set realistic expectations for yield

Translate zoning potential into a credible yield range, with clear drivers you can interrogate quickly.

  • Risk-adjusted FAR scenarios
  • Best, likely, and conservative ranges
  • Transparent reduction drivers

Reflects how projects actually get designed.

Output: best / likely / conservative yield bands with drivers.

3

Assemblage & Transfer

Test scenarios that materially change feasibility

Evaluate assemblage and transfer scenarios that materially change feasibility, not just theoretical FAR.

  • Air rights + existing buildings
  • Corner lot efficiency
  • Scenario-driven combinations

Same site, very different outcomes.

Output: scenarios that change the decision, not just the FAR.

Here’s what that looks like for a real property.

SAMPLE OUTPUT

What a Feasibility Decision Looks Like

One property. A credible range. The constraints behind it — so you know whether to proceed.

SAMPLE PROPERTY
Location
Manhattan
Zoning
C6
Lot Area
7,500 sf
Existing Use
Mixed-use building
Stair Count Pressure
Medium
Mixed-Use Separation
Low
Courtyard Requirement
High
ESTIMATED YIELD RANGE
Best Case
~68,000 sf
Most Likely
~61,000 sf
Conservative
~55,000 sf
Primary reduction drivers
  • Courtyard requirement
  • Circulation inefficiencies
  • Vertical egress constraints

Sample output shown for illustrative purposes only.

HOW THIS IS FRAMED

AirFeet combines zoning and building constraints with common development patterns to surface early signals and a risk-adjusted yield range for discussion.

A five-minute read built for the first feasibility conversation.

FREE RESOURCE

Learn How Zoning Actually Works

A practical guide to the rules that shape outcomes — FAR, use, and transferability — and the traps that waste time early.

  • How FAR, height factors, and use groups interact
  • When air rights and transfers are actually feasible
  • What early feasibility screens should include
What’s inside

Short, decision-ready explainers with examples — built for developers and brokers.

AIR RIGHTS
Transfer basics + common traps
FAR
Why “max FAR” ≠ buildable
FEASIBILITY
Early screens that save time

Make the feasibility decision.

A credible yield range, the constraints behind it, and a clear reason to proceed — or stop — before time and capital are committed.